Review Request:Tmac 6

• Oct 30, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #1

pr baller 23

Sep 29, 2003

290

57

Could somebody review these please. They look pretty funky this year. I didnt like the 5s for performance, the traction was horrible and they heated up way to much for my liking. Felt like a suana on my feet. Thanks for any help.

 

• Nov 2, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #2

unregistered(d)

Oct 4, 2001

1,919

13

Well, I am not a shoe expert, but I can give you a comment.
I played in them for 8 hours.. maybe bit more.
This is a great shoe. Personally, I love this better than any Air Jordans.
Great traction, comfort, and support... nothing bad for me.
I am 6 2, and wear sz 12.

 

• Nov 3, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #3

mr sneakerprodigy

Apr 29, 2006

32

10

would this be a good shoe for a quick pf?

 

• Nov 4, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #4

unregistered(d)

Oct 4, 2001

1,919

13

^^ Well, I think that this shoe is built for g.
If you are heavy pf, the shoe is not for you.

 

• Nov 6, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #5

gradual

Jul 4, 2006

4

10

I'm curious about the formotion technology on the shoe.
What do think about it?
Could you notice it during play?
Do you feel that it enhanced court feel?
Etc...

Thanks

 

• Nov 7, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #6

unregistered(d)

Oct 4, 2001

1,919

13

^^ All I can say is that the traction, responsiveness, and comfort are very good; 9-10 for each. Ankle support is 8-8.5 out of 10 probably.

I am not a shoe expert, that explains how a technology works well, so I can not give you a technical review. But, I have been wearing tons of Jordan, Nike... and some Adidas.. This is def. great shoe. Imo, better than most of Jordans and Nikes.

Formotion tech. is there, I believe. Don't expect huge impact, but it helps on cutting/slashing. You can feel small difference.
If you play sf or any g positions, you will not be regret on getting tmac 6.

 

• Nov 8, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #7

ziostilon

Jan 14, 2006

2,296

106

^^do u think of it as a huge improvement from the TMAC 5, and what about comparing it to shoes like the AZK1, 2k4, or XXI, LBJIV

 

• Nov 9, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #8

unregistered(d)

Oct 4, 2001

1,919

13

^^ I never loved ZK1 and 2K4.

2K4 still hurts my feet, and the ankle strap bothers me.
I never felt that 2K4 was comfortable. The shoes overall fit is too too too tight.

ZK1 is a good shoe, but I did not like the shoe.
The shoe delayed me when I tried to make a drive-in movement. I think that the shoe is bad for cutting/slashing.
I hate the forefoot area of ZK1.

XXI was mad heavy for me. I don't believe that XXI is built for g positions. 'Looks' is horrible too.

LBJ IV is also mad mad mad heavy shoes. I tried them on, but I will pass. I might cop all black one for rocking..... that's all. Cushioninh was bit firm too.

If I compare Tmac VI to Air Jordans......., then AJ 14 OG and AJ 17 OG are only better balling shoe in some areas(not overall). 14 is lighter, and 17 has crazy ankle support.... Tmac VI is real deal.

Compare to Tmac V, Tmac VI shows a huge improvement on the traction area.

Well Tmac VI is not light but not that heavy.
People have different taste, but I really love Tmac VI.
You better play in them.

Well, please remember that this is just my opinion; not everyone thinks the same as I do.

 

• Nov 9, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #9

tangaroo

Jun 14, 2006

93

10

i just ebayed the black/red, hopefully ill play in em in a week or so and review it sometime
____________

 

• Nov 9, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #10

pr baller 23

Sep 29, 2003

290

57

I held the T-mac 6's in my hand and they felt pretty bulky, your foot sits pretty high off the ground in these, Im not a fan of them really. they look alright, but I dont think I would like playing in them.

 

• Nov 9, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #11

unregistered(d)

Oct 4, 2001

1,919

13

^^ If that's your case, go for other shoes.
But, since you never played in them, then you can not say that Tmac VI is a bad hooping shoe.
Like I said above, it is just my opinion.
Tmac VI is not bulky for me.
I think that you are a Nike guy like I used to.
There are tons of choice though.
The thing that I can tell you is that I am 200% satisfied.

 

• Nov 9, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #12

storm ryder

Dec 23, 1999

365

14

How can you tell if a shoe is bulky and sits high off the ground without putting them on your feet?

 

• Nov 10, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #13

david choi

Jun 11, 2001

998

531

true oh true! U have to put them on to find out! U cant tell by just looking at the midsoles.

 

• Nov 10, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #14

ziostilon

Jan 14, 2006

2,296

106

ggotsonyun, does the TMAC VI have a good fit and cushioning? and what about its stability?

 

• Nov 10, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #15

xkevz

Dec 10, 2005

109

10

i tried em on at footaction. they didnt feel THAT high off the ground. the fit felt pretty good from what i can remember. cushioning was just alright. felt a little firm.

Team M.B.S.W.​

 

• Nov 12, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #16

nyk buc

Oct 27, 2005

3,147

10

this is the LIGHTEST shoe ever.

when i tried them on, it felt like nothing was on.

def. the best shoe out.

gotta put it on ur feet to know.

 

• Nov 12, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #17

theemcee0

Sep 9, 2005

67

10

will somebody just review the shoe already..

 

• Nov 12, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #18

ziostilon

Jan 14, 2006

2,296

106

i'm wondering about the cushioning most of all, does it compare to Zoom Air

 

• Nov 14, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #19

xkevz

Dec 10, 2005

109

10

imo the cushioning doesnt compare to zoom air. id take zoom air over this any day.

Team M.B.S.W.​

 

• Nov 14, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #20

vincepoy

Dec 9, 2005

10

10

It's really hard to compare shoes when it's new as it's only good to compare shoes after they've been broken in.
Cheers,
Vince

 

• Nov 14, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #21

ziostilon

Jan 14, 2006

2,296

106

what cushioning tech. does the T-MAC 6 have?

 

• Nov 14, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #22

xkevz

Dec 10, 2005

109

10

adiprene.

Team M.B.S.W.​

 

• Nov 14, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #23

theemcee0

Sep 9, 2005

67

10

how could you forget the formotion..

 

• Nov 15, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #24

tangaroo

Jun 14, 2006

93

10

^dang does it help much?
____________

 

• Nov 15, 2006

• %22 data-success="Embed code HTML copied to clipboard." class="">
• #25

baller b pepper

Jun 2, 2002

4

10

arent they only 15 onces?
thats pretty decent and light...

B-STARR .
YOU AIN'T MY BROTHER FROM ANOTHER MOTHER
I got leg fetish, shes has a rap fetish,
shes natural and fresh, like the assets like lettucemyspaceSoundclick siteAudiri Music site

​